首页> 外文OA文献 >Soil sample handling for routine analysis of plant-available soil potassium
【2h】

Soil sample handling for routine analysis of plant-available soil potassium

机译:土壤样品处理,用于植物可用土壤钾的常规分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Soil K extraction with neutral 1 M ammonium-acetate (NH4OAc) based on air-dried or oven-dried samples is the most widely used soil test for K. It has long been recognized that sample drying often increases K extracted by this test. An NH4OAc K test based on field-moist samples (MK) was used until 1988 by the Iowa State University laboratory but was abandoned because no private laboratory adopted it. In the 1960\u27s work was done to look at different chemical treatments that prevent K from being released upon sample drying or revert the drying effect before K extraction. The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of sample drying and two post-drying treatments on extracted soil K and its relationships with crop yield response to K fertilizer. Sample treatments before measuring K with the NH4OAc extractant were no treatment (test on field-moist samples), drying at 40 C (DK), water incubation (Rewet K), and water-octanol incubation (Octanol K). Soil samples were collected from single-year and multi-year K response trials with corn (Zea mays L.) or soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] that were conducted at 19 Iowa fields from 2001 to 2004. Soil K extracted with DK was higher than for MK, and these tests were linearly correlated (r2 = 0.53). The K extracted with Rewet-K and Octanol-K tests often was less than for DK, and Octanol-K values and were as low as values for MK. Rewet-K and MK-values were linearly related (r2 = 0.59). Octanol-K was linearly but poorly related to MK (r2 = 0.35). The difference between K extracted by MK and that extracted by DK, Rewet K, or Octanol K tended to be inversely related to the soil K level. Soil types and measured soil properties (texture, cation exchange capacity, pH, and organic matter) did not clearly explain the differences between K tests. The Octanol-K test did not measure plant-available appropriately and was the worst method for prediction of crop response to K fertilization. The Rewet K test was approximately similar to DK and MK and would be more practical for routine testing than MK test. Further field calibration research including a wider range of field conditions is needed to better compare these three K testing methods.Abbreviations: CN, Cate-Nelson; DK, oven-dried K test; LP, linear-plateau; MK, field-moist K test; NH4OAc, ammonium-acetate; Octanol K, K extracted after water-octanol incubation; QP; quadratic-plateau; Rewet-K, K extracted after incubation with water.
机译:基于风干或烤箱干燥样品的中性1 M醋酸铵(NH4OAc)萃取土壤K是最广泛使用的土壤K试验。人们早就认识到,样品干燥通常会增加通过该试验萃取的K。爱荷华州立大学的实验室直到1988年才使用基于田间潮湿样品(MK)的NH4OAc K试验,但由于没有私人实验室采用,因此被放弃。在1960年代,人们研究了不同的化学处理方法,以防止样品干燥后释放出钾,或者在提取钾之前恢复干燥效果。这项研究的目的是评估样品干燥和两次干燥后处理对提取的土壤钾的影响及其与作物对钾肥的响应的关系。在用NH4OAc萃取剂测量K之前,样品处理为无处理(在野外潮湿的样品上进行测试),在40 C(DK)下干燥,水温育(Rewet K)和水辛醇温育(辛醇K)。土壤样品是从2001年至2004年在爱荷华州19个田地进行的玉米(Zea mays L.)或大豆[Glycine max(L.)Merr。]的多年期和多年期钾肥响应试验中收集的。 DK的情况比MK的情况要高,并且这些测试呈线性相关(r2 = 0.53)。用Rewet-K和Octanol-K测试提取的K通常小于DK和Octanol-K值,并且与MK值一样低。 Rewet-K和MK值呈线性相关(r2 = 0.59)。辛醇-K呈线性关系,但与MK的相关性较弱(r2 = 0.35)。 MK提取的K与DK,Rewet K或辛醇K提取的K之间的差异往往与土壤K含量成反比。土壤类型和测得的土壤性质(质地,阳离子交换能力,pH和有机物)不能清楚地解释K试验之间的差异。辛醇-钾测试无法适当地测量植物的有效性,是预测作物对钾肥反应的最差方法。 Rewet K测试与DK和MK大致相似,对于常规测试而言,比MK测试更加实用。为了更好地比较这三种K测试方法,需要进行更广泛的现场条件研究,以更好地比较这三种K测试方法。 DK,烘箱K检验; LP,线性平稳; MK,现场潮湿K测试; NH4OAc,醋酸铵;辛醇K,水辛醇孵育后提取的K; QP;二次高原Rewet-K,用水孵育后提取K。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hill, Brian Edward;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号